CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Study
According
to the census which was conducted by the National Institute of
Statistics of Cambodia (NIS) in 2008, it was revealed that females
accounted for 51% of Cambodia’s total population. In 2009 and 2010 only
18% of Cambodian women enrolled in postgraduate degrees, compared with
total enrolment (MoEYS, 2011). Why has these happened? What are the
factors that influence this result? From my own observation at the Royal
University of Phnom Penh (RUPP) in the master degree in education (MEd)
in cohort 6; a researcher sees clearly that only 39% in researcher’s
classroom are women. Similarly, in cohort 7, which is a new cohort,
enrolled in academic year 2013 in the same program only 16% of Cambodian
women enrolled in the postgraduate degree. It is clear that this is
unevenness in number of Cambodian female students enrolling in post
graduate study. This has long term consequences for the development of
Cambodia.
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
Females
play a critical role in society in order to contribute to develop a
nation. According to Ministry of Women’s Affair (2009) wrote in five
years strategic plan called Neary Rattanak III that women are economic
and social backbone. Therefore, pushing women to reach higher education
is the important tasks for government and relevant stakeholders have to
do. However, females in higher education in Cambodia especially graduate
or postgraduate level are still limited. These have resulted from
certain factors such as gender, finance, family background and cultural
factors.
2.1 Gender
Southeast Asian countries structure with
multi pictures of gender gap in access to tertiary education. In many
countries, females have been under-represented in tertiary education.
Berggren (as cited in Lin, 2011) indicated that in belief of the
restrictions of gender role anticipation and social norm, females are
low educational aspiration to pursue tertiary education than males.
According to Lee (1998) illustrated that female students made up only
32% of the total higher education enrollment during 1994 in Indonesia.
The Republic of Korea, Japan and the Pacific Islands have the best
female gross tertiary enrollment ratios, followed by Thailand, the
People’s Republic of China and the Philippines. However, there were huge
gender differences in Cambodia, Bhutan, Bangladesh, the Nepal
(Ramachandran, 2010). Figure 1 shows the percentage of the female
students access tertiary education in Asean countries in 2010. Based on
this figure illustrated the percentage of female students have attended
higher education was almost balanced such as Brunei, Thailand,
Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines and Singapore. Instead,
Cambodia has still substantial gender disparities. Particularly, female
students in tertiary education comprise only about 35% of total
enrolment. These gender disparities may be traced to earlier levels of
schooling. The dropout rates of girls in Cambodia are higher than boys
at all levels of education, which limits the pool of female candidates,
are able to access tertiary education (Velasco, 2004). However, in order
to promote gender equity, Cambodia has set up many national mechanisms
such as Ministry of Women Affair (MoWA), the technical Working Group on
Gender (built in 2004 and supervised by MoWA, with the Japan
International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and UNDP as co-coordinators),
the Cambodia National Council for Women (ADB, 2012). Furthermore,
Cambodian government also passed many essential policies and laws, for
instance, the convention on the Elimination of All forms of
Discrimination against Women, the law on the Prevention of Domestic
Violence and Protection of Victims in 2005 and the National Strategic
Development Plan (NSDP) 2006-2009 was about gender mainstreaming as
strategic to all sectors.
Figure 1
Percentage of Females at Tertiary Education in ASEAN Countries, 2007
Figure is deleted
Note: This Data are collected from EFA Global Monitoring Report 2010 (UNESCO, 2011).
2.2 Barriers to Access Tertiary Education
This
section examines some of the barriers and other factors which affect
women attend graduate or post graduate study. There are four factors
that this section examines such as personal factor, financial barriers,
family background and cultural factors (World Bank, 2009).
2.2.1 Personal Factor
Factor
that influences the female students’ aspiration to pursue post-graduate
or graduate education is female students themselves. According to Lin
(2011) found that there were many reasons that resulted from female
students low expectation for tertiary education. First, she found that
female students did not attract with research work, while post-graduate
degree was completed by doing research, and this degree normally
orientated to research job as well. Next, she found that female students
were lack of self-confidence in educational capability that induced
them low or nonexistent expectation for post-graduate degree. Finally,
she found that female students were low expectation for higher
education, because they were shortage of self-motivation for more
studies.
2.2.2 Financial Barriers
Sami (as cited in World
Bank, 2009) argued the studies on tertiary education equity in developed
countries classify financial barriers in to three types: First the
cost-benefit barrier, second, the cash-constraint or liquidity barrier
and the last, the internalized liquidity constraint or the debt aversion
barrier. Studies on higher education equity in Southeast Asia countries
implicitly utilize those three types above. The studies have just
analyzed how income level impact women’s access to tertiary education.
Brock and Hsieh (2011) demonstrated that family size is an issue in the
more dependents there were in the home; the more likely that home based
work will be carried on. they were referring to the ability of a family
to pay school fee in order to strengthen the capacity of survival both
from the immediate income generation from home based work and from the
possibility that some of the children, whether boy or girls, may proceed
to more lucrative employment as a result of educational success. In an
old study, conducted by Beswick and Boreham (1985) on the Australian
system of tertiary education highlighted and made some interesting
connections between parental attitudes and the presence or absence of
financial assistance for female students. Moore (1987) stated that in
general, women who accomplish and complete Australian tertiary education
seem to have benefited more from external financial assistance than
from familial aid.
Students from better economic backgrounds have
better access to higher education than poor students. Ramachandran
(2010) showed that some parents do not invest in the education of their
daughters and in very poor households, girls are withdrawn from school.
For example, a recent national economic survey in Indonesia indicated
that one 3.3 % of students from the lowest, 20% income groups and only
4.8% enroll in universities. However, 30.9% from the highest income
families were enrolled in higher education (Nizam, 2006).
2.2.3 Family Factors
Families
play an indispensable role in sending their children to schools.
Children are far more likely to attend university if one or both of
their parents has completed a university degree. A recent Statistics
Canada study found that youth whose parents have at least some
university experience are close to twice as likely to attend university
as those whose parents had completed only high school.
Parents play a
critical role in encouraging their children to pursue higher education.
Sewell and Shah (1968) indicated that parental encouragement seemed to
have strongest influence on tertiary educational plans of female
students. Furthermore, Mullent (as cited in Lin, 2011) illustrated that
higher educational and higher socio-economic status parents are likely
to have higher aspiration for their children’s education. This enabled
children themselves to have higher expectation for higher educational
attainment. Nevertheless, Christie and Munro (2003) found that poor
educated and lower economic status parents tended to be lower
expectation for their children to pursue tertiary education. Because
they were not well-understood to provide good advice to their children,
we compared to high-educated and higher socio-economic parents. Mullen,
Goyette and Soares (2003) also found that parents’ education and
socio-economic status were crucial impact to their children’s graduate
program enrollment. These reveals that parental education and family
socio-economic status are very closely link to their children’s
aspiration.
Parental education and family income background also
have positive effects on individual choice to enroll in higher
education. It implies that parents with higher education or higher
earnings intend to build better learning environments for children. They
have stronger willingness to pay for higher education than parents with
lower education and income background (Li & Min, 2001). Similar
studies on higher education in advanced countries revealed that parental
education or occupation impacts access to higher education in East
Asian countries (Finnie, Laporte & Lascelles, 2004). They also found
that family backgrounds tend to be a main determinant of access to
higher education. Students whose parents are better educated or have
professional occupations have better access to higher education.
Similarly, Budria (as cited in Ogawa & Iimura, 2010) argued that
parental level of education is related to the child’s choice of the type
and length of his/her higher education.
According to Becker (1981),
families invest in children’s education, but are constrained by
economic and educational resources of the families. They invest if they
have the resources to spend. Li and Min (2001) found that more
importantly, the significance of these factors applies to developed
countries like the United States of America and less developed countries
with different cultural or economic structures.
Ding (2007) found
that students whose fathers have professional or administrative jobs and
ones who are from high income households have higher chance to enter
higher education. However, Agadjanian and Liew (2005) stated that
parental education has some significance impact on transition to
tertiary in Malaysia. According to Huang (2005) argued that father’s
education achievement and occupation were weakly negative impact on
student academic accomplishment.
2.2.4 Cultural Factors.
The
under-representation of female students in higher education may emerge
from cultural and social factors. Females may have unequal educational
opportunities because of cultural barriers. For example, Indonesian
families traditionally arrange their daughters to get married as soon as
they finish primary school (Suryadarma et al, 2006). In China son
preference is still prevalent, because Chinese culture needs the son to
carry the family lineage. Therefore, females are discriminated against
and not offered equal education opportunities by their parents (Wang,
2005). Furthermore, other studies found that families in Western Europe
and North American have tended to favor the attendance of male children
rather than female children in tertiary education, particularly when a
financial burden was involved (Moore, 1987).
Many people who live in
Southeast Asian countries believe that females are more inferior than
males are common. They have preconceived beliefs or ideas of women’s
personality traits, characteristics, abilities and roles in society. Don
(2001) argued that these beliefs are even reinforced in school
textbooks in which women are supposed to look after housework and do
manual work. Berggren (2006) stated women have been prepared from
childhood to be caretakers for other members in family. This role is not
only completed in their childhood but also continue to adult life when
they get married. These women’s roles and accountabilities are the
factors that minimize women’s aspiration to pursue higher education
particularly post graduate degree (Lin, 2011).
From my own
observation, some Cambodian females believe that too much education such
as post graduate or graduate degree will prevent them from a suitable
marriage. It means that they will not find a suitable partner. In
Cambodian society, women are liable to get married with men with higher
educational accomplishment than themselves, while men are likely to be
married to women with lower educational achievement than themselves.
These prevent females from enrolling in higher education. Another
cultural practice that prevents some Cambodian female from pursuing
tertiary education is that when females finish their undergraduate
degree; they are expecting to get married then they continue their
studies to postgraduate, but when they get married, burden of family are
more added such as involving in taking care of their husband and
children and household. Therefore, they have withdrew from studies.
2.3 Female Student’s Aspiration to Pursue Post-graduate Level of Education
According
to business dictionary on Website the term motivation or aspiration
means that internal and external factors that stimulate desire and
energy in people to be continually interested and committed to a job,
role or subject, or to make an effort to attain a goal. Motivation or
aspiration gives the basis powers that enable people to pursue success
and it will impact individuals in the future to get successful or not.
Students’ aspiration plays a crucial role in pursuing higher level of
education. Moreover, Schoenfeld (as cited in Mark & Edgington, 2006)
found that there are three main motivations for individuals considering
to pursue graduate or post graduate school such as personal
development, career switching and career enhancement. .
This section examines these three motivations that drive female students to pursue graduate or postgraduate level of study.
2.3.1 Career Advancement
Career
Enhancement, which is portrayed by the demand of getting professional
career needed for development, would help the respondent to maintain
his/her position prosperously and compete with others in the business
world. It is also a motivation that respondent tries to pursue in order
to improve long term finance and financial security. Moreover, these
individuals expect that a graduate or post graduate level of education
will offer them the chance for more challenging and interesting job in
future (Marks & Edington, 2006).
In order to improve income and
financial stability, individuals are motivated by pursuit higher
education especially graduate or post graduate level. Marks and Edington
(2006) stated that financial stability could occur provided that
individuals had ability to facilitate and improve economic process,
manage risks and manage unexpected accidence. All these issues are not
easy to manage; therefore, in order to manage these individuals have to
pursue higher education. Moreover, Ellis, Pollock, Lopez and
Perez-Quinones (2010) stated that pursuit graduate school will generally
cause individuals to earn higher starting compensation at the initial
of his or her career. According to National Science Foundation report
(2006) revealed that graduates who were holding bachelor degree got an
average salary $45,000 and those who were holding master degree got an
average salary $65,000 and those who were holding a fresh graduate PhD
got an average salary $89,000 for the position of assistant professor in
nine months. Similarly, according to Born (2002) revealed that bachelor
graduated students were earning in 1990 in Canada on average salary
(38,000) five years later. For master graduated students were earning on
the average salary (50,000) one third more than bachelor graduated
students.
Another motivation factor for graduates is the increasing
in the job opportunity in challenging working environment. Ellis, et
al., (2010) explained that graduate school helped open up career path
that was easy to obtain. They added that some jobs completely need
advance degree. For instance, if individuals plan to teach or conduct
research in an academic organization, PhD will require. Further, Master
degrees are also critical in advance development work such as research
work, project leadership. Even if graduate schools are not strict
requirement for those positions, they are often viewing as prior
criterion for job seekers in their applications.
Job promotion is
another factor which motivates individuals to pursue graduate school.
According to Teowkul, Seributra, Sangkaworn, Jivasantikarn, Denvilai and
Mujtaba (2009) explained that people need job promotion because it is
relevant to benefits such as higher salary, better benefits, more
responsibility, possibilities for training and studies and improved
workplace. Therefore, pursuit graduate program is unavoidable for
individuals who want to seek these kinds of benefits.
2.3.2 Career Switching
Career
switching relies on the desire of transition from one career path to
another in order to let one switch occupational area (Marks &
Edington, 2006; Teowkul et al., 2009). There are many factors which pull
individuals to change their job such as to seek higher salary, career
advancement, job security, more freedom, more respect and value, good
reputation of organization and higher educational opportunity (Alishah,
Fakhr, Ahmand & Zaman, 2010). These factors are individuals’
expectation that all expect to gain. However, if these factors are not
met, job switching or job quitting will occur. Ntumba and McCain (2010)
stated that individuals switched their job because in their former job
did not meet their expectation.
2.3.3 Personal development
According
to Jackson (1999) explained that personal development is utilized to
emphasize the processes of learning activities that are undertaken by
individuals to develop themselves. He also added that personal
development was accepted by individuals to reflect upon their own
learning, performance and or accomplishment and to plan for their
personal educational and career advancement. Similarly, Marks and
Edgington (2006) illustrated that personal development is differentiated
by the desire to improve confidence in order to succeed, to gain
respect from individual at workplace and to develop the skills that are
essential for doing one’s job.
There are many motivational factors
that push individuals to pursue graduate school in term of personal
development such as to satisfy individual needs in self-improvement, to
get more respect from others, to get more self-confidence, to accomplish
educational goal and improve English skill (Teowkul et al., 2009).
Individuals desire to satisfy self-improvement or personal growth means
that they desire to know and to understand that all are stated in
Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Model (Maslow, 1943). He added that
acquiring knowledge has been reckoned as crucial for accomplishing the
basic needs. Moreover, the desire to know and to understand is cognitive
(Teowkul, et al., 2009)
Therefore, in order to meet these needs individuals are motivated by pursuit graduate or post graduate level.
To obtain more respect from others is another factor that motivates
individuals to pursue graduate level. According to Maslow’s Hierarchy of
Needs stated that all people have a need to feel respected, this
involves the need of having self-esteem and self-respect (Maslow, 1943).
He added that all the people become involved in a profession or hobby
in order to obtain recognition, these offer person sense of contribution
or value. He also continued that there two version of esteem needs such
as low version and higher version. People with low self-esteem desire
respect from others such as desire for status, fame, prestige,
recognition, and attention. And people with high self-esteem have a
desire for strength, mastery, self-confidence, competence, independence,
and freedom (Maslow, 1943). Therefore, in order to obtain these,
individuals are driven by pursuit graduate or post graduate level.
Another factor that individuals pursue graduate level is to gain more
self-confidence. Satisfaction of the self-esteem desire leads to have
feeling of self-confidence, capacity, strength, and worth, if
individuals are welcomed in the academic environment and with academic
environment, individuals can promote the building of a self-confidence
and self-esteem rely on perceived development in performance (Teowkul et
al., 2009). Therefore, individuals pursue higher education or graduate
education in order to promote more confidence.
One more factor that
drives individuals to continue their studies to graduate level is to
accomplish an educational goal. Yorks stated (as cited in (Teowkul et
al., 2009) that a set of knowledge, skills can help individual to be
secure in choosing education and occupation to benefit themselves.
Mujtaba and Presiosi (2006) emphasized that individuals understanding
are crucial for reviewing, planning and taking responsibility for their
own learning in order to encourage a positive attitude for learning in a
full life, develop their general skills for learning and career
management.
Another factor that motivates students or individuals to
pursue graduate school is to enhance language skills. Non English
students enroll in a graduate or postgraduate degree program in order to
improve English skill especially writing, reading and speaking skill.
All these skills are introduced in graduate degree program. Further,
students who register in graduate program will have chance to reflect
their own learning experiences, personal and educational development,
personal strength and weakness, and manage for better employment and
future promotion in their life (Teowkul et al., 2009)
REFERENCES
Adadjanian,
V., & Liew, H. P. (2005). Preferential policies and ethnic
differences in post-Secondary education in peninsular Malaysia. Race,
Ethnicity and Education, 8(2) 213-230.
Alishah, I., Fakhr, Z.,
Ahmand, M. S., & Zaman, K. (2010). Measurement push, pull, and
personal factors affecting turnover intention: A Case of University
Teachers in Pakistan. Review of Business Studies, 3(1) 167-192.
Asian Development Bank (ADB) (2012). Cambodia: Country Gender Analysis.
Anderson,
G., & Arsenault, N. (1998). Fundamentals of Educational
Research,(2nd ed.). USA: The Falmer Press, Taylor & Francis Inc.
Ayres,
D. M. (2000a). Anatomy of a crisis: Educational development and the
state in Cambodia,1953-1998. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Ayres,
D. M. (2000b) Tradition, modernity, and the development of education in
Cambodia. Comparative Education Review, 44 (4), 440-463.
Baker, G. S. (1981). A Treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Berggren,
C. (2006). Labour market influence on recruitment to higher education
gender and class perspectives. Higher Education, 52, 121-148.
Beswick, D. G., & Boreham, J. E. (1985). Women’s success and perspective in career. Research Working Paper, 84, 1-25.
Bone, A. (2002). Pursuing a master’s degree: Opportunity cost and benefits. Education Quarterly Review, 8(4), 1-13.
Brock,
C., & Hsieh, P. J. (2011). Aspects of gender and education in
South-East Asia. In Brock, C., & Symaco, L. P. Education in
South-East Asia (pp.245-264). United Kingdom: Symposium Books.
Can, L. T. (1991). Higher education reform in Vietnam, Loas and Cambodia. Comparative Education Review, 35(1), 170-176.
Chandler, D. (2008). A history of cambodia (4 thEdit). Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.
Chhum,
S. (1973). Higher education in the Khmer Republic. In Y. Y. Hoong
(Ed.), Development of Higher Education in Southeast Asia: Problems and
issues (pp. 100-104). Singapore: The regional institute of higher
education and development
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Marrison,
K. (2007). Research Methods in Education (6th ed.). USA and London:
Routledge, Taylor & Fracis Group.
Christie, M. & Munro, M.
(2003), “The logic of loans: Students’ perceptions of the costs and
benefits of the student loan”. British Journal of Sociology of
Education, 24(5), 621-636.
Ding, X. (2007). Expansion and equality of access to higher education in China. Frontiers of Education in China, 2(2), 151-162.
Do, T. B. L. (2001). Gender issues in education. Vietnam: UNECO. Retrieve from http://www.unescobkk.org/?id=9407
Finnie,
R., Laporte, C., & Lascelles, Eric. (2004). Family background and
access to post-secondary education: What happened over the 1990s?
Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series, 226, 1-43.
Fraenkel,
J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and
evaluate research in education, (8th ed.). America, New York:
McGraw-Hill
Gay, R. L., Mills, E. G., & Airasian, P. (2009).
Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. New
Jersey: Person Education, Inc
Howard, H. (1967). Higher education
and development in the South East Asia (Vol. II ). Paris, France: United
Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and
International Association of Universities (IAU).
Huang, L. (2005).
Elitism and equality in Chinese higher education: Studies of student
socioeconomic background, investment in education, and career
aspirations, (published doctoral thesis). Stockholm: Institute of
International Education.
Hun, S. (2011). Keynote address at the
conferment of certificate and degree to graduates of the University of
Human Resources in August 11, 2011, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Kang, C., & Liv, D. (2009). Living wage survey for Cambodia’s garment industry. The
Cambodia Institute of Development Study
Knutsen, D. W., (2011). Motivation to pursue higher education. (Ed.D. Dissertations).
Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.olivet.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=
1024&context=edd_diss
Li,
W., & Min, W. (2001). Tuition, private demand and higher education
in China. Graduate School of Education, Peking Universtiy, Beijin.
Lin, M. J. (2011). Women’s aspirations for graduate education in Taiwan. International
Journal of Educational Development, 31, 515-523. Retrieved from http://elsevier.com/locate/ijedudev
Lodico,
M. G., Spaulding, D. T., & Voegtle, . H. (2 010). Methods in
educational research: From theory to practice, (2nd ed). The United
States of America: Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint.
Marks, J., &
Edgington, R. (2006). Motivations and barriers for women in the pursuit
of an MBA degree. GMAC Research Report, The Magazine of the Graduate
Management Admission Council, GMAC Research Reports RR-06-I2. Retrieved
from
http://www.gmac.com/NR/rdonlyres/2D881F31-42CB-4365-9A34-00DA2441908C/0/RR0612MotivationsBarriers
for Women. pdf.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human
motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396. Retrieved from
http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Maslow/motivation.htm
Masson, G.,
& Fergusso, L. (1997). A culture under siege:post-colonial higher
education and teacher education in Cambodia from 1953 to 1979. History
of Education, 28(2), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0046760970260106
Mcmillan,
J. H. (1996). Educational research: Fundamental for the consumer, (2nd
ed). United States of America: HarperCollins Publisher Inc.
MoEYS.
(2011). Education congress report on the education, youth and sports
performance in the academic year 2009-2010 and the academic year
2010-2011 Goal.
MoEYS. (2012). Educational statistics and indicator.
MoWA. (2009). Five year strategic plan 2009-2013. Neary Rattanak III
Moore,
K. M. (1987). Women’s access and opportunity in higher education:
toward the twenty-first century. Comparative Education, 23(1), 23-34.
Mujtaba,
B. G. and Preziosi, R. C. (2006). Adult education in academia:
Recruiting and retaining extraordinary facilitators of learning (2nd
Edition). Information Age Publishing. Greenwich, Connecticut.
Mullen,
A. L., Goyette, K. A., & Soares, J. A. (2003). Who goes to graduate
school? social and academic correlates of educational continuation
after college. Sociology of Education,76 (2),143-169.
NIS. (2008). General population census of Cambodia
Nizam. (2006). Higher education in South-East Asia, ed. Bangkok: UNESCO, pp. 35-68
Ntumba,
L., & McCain, S., C. (2010). Push and pull factors: influence on
female managers and executives’ exit from the workplace, impact on job
satisfaction and organizational commitment. Widener University
Ogawa,
K., & Iimura, K. (2010). Determinants of access and equity in
tertiary education: The case of Indonesia. Excellence in Higher
Education,1, 3-22.
Pit, C., & Ford, D. (2004). Cambodian
higher education: Mixed visions In P. G. A. & T. Umakoshi (Ed.),
Asian Universities: Historical Perspectives and Contemporary Challenges
(pp. 333-362). Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press
Ramachandran, V. (2010). Gender issues in higher education. Bangkok: UNESCO Asia and Pacific Regional Bureau for Education.
Rany,
S., Zain, A. N. M., & Jamil, H. (2012). Establishment of
institutional policies for enhancing education quality in Cambodian
universities. International Journal of Higher Education,1(1), 1-18.
doi:10.5430/ijhe.v1n1p
Rany, S., Zain, A. N. M., & Jamil, H.
(2012).Cambodia’s higher education development in historical
perspectives (1863-2012). International Journal of Learning &
Development, 2(2), 1-16. doi: 10.5296/ijld.v2i2.1670.
Santry, P.
(2005). When apsaras smile. Women and development in Cambodia 1990-2000:
Cultural barriers to change. (Doctoral thesis, School of Education,
Faculty of Human Development, Victoria University).
Sewell, W. H.,
& Shah, V. P. (1968). Social class, parental encouragement, and
educational aspirations. American Journal of Sociology,73(5), 559-572.
Sloper,
D. W., & Duggan, S. (2001). Reviewed works: Higher education in
Cambodia: The social and educational context for reconstruction.
Comparative Education, 37(2), 243-246.
Suryadarma, D., Widyanti,
W., Suryahadi, A., & Sumarto, S. (2006). From access to Income:
Regional and ethnic inequality in Indonesia. SMERU Research
Institute,1-29.
Teowkul, K., Seributra, N. J., Sangkaworn, C. S.,
Jivasantikarn,C., Denvilai, S., & Mujtaba, B. G., (2009).
Motivational factors of graduate Thai students pursuing master and
doctoral degrees in business. RU International Journal, 3(1), 25-56.
Tully,
J. (2002). France on the Mekong: A history of the protectorate in
Cambodia, 1863-1953. Lanham, Md.: University Press of America.
The
Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada (2007). Trends in
higher education: Enrollment. Ottawa: The Association of Universities
and Colleges of Canada. Retrieve from
http://www.aucc.ca/_pdf/english/publications/trends-2011-vol1-enrolment-e.pdf
Velasco, E. (2004). Ensuring gender equity in education for all: Is Cambodia on track? Prospects, 34(1), 37-51.
Virak,
Y. (2009). Student mobility in Southeast Asia: The case of Cambodia.
Paper presented at the regional seminar on student mobility in Southeast
Asia. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Walker, K. (2012). Cambodia’s postgraduate students: Emerging patterns and trend. AJTLHE, 4(1), 1-13.
Wang,
W. (2005). Son preference and educational opportunities of children in
China: I wish you were a boy. Gender Issues, 22(2), 1-30.
World
Bank (2009). Thailand towards a competitive higher education system in a
global economy. World Bank. Retrieved from
http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2009/11/18/000333037_20091118225519/Rendered/PDF/516810ESW0WHIT1onitor0Higher0Resize.pdf